Defense Training & Simulation Services M&A

Last updated

In short

Training and simulation M&A rose 47.5% in 2025 according to Capstone Partners, with strategic buyers doing 72.9% of deals and private equity returning in 2026, mostly through add-ons. The market prices in two tiers: CAE paid about 13.5x EBITDA for L3Harris's Military Training business, which came with simulator programs and backlog, while Cubic's labor-based training services unit sold for 7.6x. Owners with proprietary simulation software or positions on major aircrew training programs sit in the higher tier.

  • 47.5%[1]

    Growth in training & simulation M&A deal count, 2025

    Capstone Partners' sector count; YTD 2026 volume up 133.3% to 14 deals

  • 72.9%[1]

    Strategic buyers' share of training & simulation deals, 2025

    43 strategic transactions, up 79.2%

  • 13.5x[2]

    CAE's multiple for L3Harris Military Training (2021)

    US$1.05B; estimated adjusted 2020 EBITDA, about 10x including expected cost savings

  • 7.6x[3]

    Cubic training services unit sale to Valiant (2018)

    EV/TTM EBITDA per Raymond James; $135M cash on $378M revenue

  • C$10.8 billion[4]

    CAE Defense & Security adjusted backlog, FY2026

    On C$2,172.4M of segment revenue; 1.10x trailing book-to-sales

M&A activity snapshot

Defense training and simulation covers flight and weapons simulators, synthetic training environments, simulation software, curriculum development and instructor services. Deal activity is rising. Capstone Partners counted a 47.5% increase in training and simulation deal volume in 2025, and 14 deals announced or completed in 2026 through early June, up 133.3%. Capstone's count covers civilian as well as military training.

The benchmark deals are a few large transactions. CAE agreed to buy L3Harris's Military Training business for US$1.05 billion, about 13.5x estimated 2020 adjusted EBITDA. BAE Systems bought Bohemia Interactive Simulations, a military simulation software company, for $200 million. Veritas Capital and Evergreen Coast Capital took Cubic private in a deal valued at about $3.0 billion including debt, though most of Cubic's business is transit fare systems, not training.

For the wider GovCon market, see the Government Contracting & Defense Services overview.

Who is buying

Global training and simulation strategics. Strategic buyers did 72.9% of training and simulation deals in 2025, with volume up 79.2% to 43 transactions. CAE and BAE Systems are the largest examples. Both are non-U.S. parents buying U.S. capability.

Defense technology companies. Newer defense tech firms buy simulation and visualization to support their own products. Shield AI announced the acquisition of Aechelon Technology, an immersive visualization company, from Sagewind Capital.

PE-backed platforms. Private equity re-engaged in 2026 after two flat years, with six PE deals year to date, five of them add-ons. For example, By Light, a Sagewind Capital portfolio company, acquired Dignitas Technologies, a modeling, simulation and training firm.

Large-cap private equity. Sponsors have also bought whole public companies with training businesses inside, as with Veritas and Evergreen's purchase of Cubic, and Greenbriar Equity's purchase of Arotech, which had a training and simulation division.

What buyers look for

Program positions. Buyers pay for seats on long-running training programs. CAE's announcement highlighted that L3Harris Military Training brought backlog and positions on the USAF SCARS simulator architecture program, the USAF F-16 simulator training program and Navy/Marine Corps F/A-18 aircrew training.

Proprietary software and devices versus instructor labor. This is the main valuation divide. CAE paid about US$1.05 billion for a business with about US$500 million of 2020 revenue, roughly 2.1x revenue by Axia's arithmetic. Cubic sold its training services unit, with $378 million of revenue and about 3,500 employees, for $135 million in cash plus a $3 million earnout, about 0.36x revenue by Axia's arithmetic.

Backlog depth. Training programs run for years. CAE's Defense and Security segment ended fiscal 2026 with C$10.8 billion of adjusted backlog and a 1.10x trailing book-to-sales ratio. Buyers ask small targets for the same backlog and book-to-bill data.

Segment margin. CAE's Defense and Security adjusted segment operating income was 9.2% of revenue in fiscal 2026, up from 7.5%. That gives owners a public benchmark for defense training margins.

What makes a strong company

A defense training or simulation company that commands a premium typically has:

  • Proprietary simulation software, visual databases or device designs that the customer cannot easily re-compete to another vendor.
  • Positions on named aircrew, weapons or synthetic training programs, with years of remaining period of performance.
  • Recurring revenue from device sustainment, instructor support and software licenses, not only one-time device sales.
  • Engineers and instructors with the clearances and platform certifications the programs require.
  • A customer base spread across services (Air Force, Navy, Army) or across U.S. and allied militaries.
  • The right NAICS coding for its work. The 611430 training size standard is $15.0 million, while flight training (611512) and computer systems design (541512) are $34.0 million.

Valuation and deal structure

The two tiers show up clearly in disclosed multiples:

These multiples are from deals between 2018 and 2021. Recent deals named by Capstone, including Aechelon and Dignitas, were undisclosed, so there is no current public multiple for a lower-middle-market training firm.

Structure points:

This is market data, not a valuation of any business. For a starting range on your own company, use the valuation tool.

Outlook

Expect deal activity to stay elevated over the next 12-24 months. Capstone's 2026 data shows volume up 133.3% year to date and private equity returning through add-ons, and the FY2027 budget request seeks $1.5 trillion for defense, though Congress has not enacted it.

The buyer mix is shifting toward software. Defense technology companies are buying visualization and simulation capability, and PE platforms are adding modeling and simulation firms. Owners with proprietary software, synthetic-environment capability or aircrew program positions will draw the most interest. Instructor-heavy services businesses will still sell, but at labor-services prices.


Own a defense training or simulation business and want a starting point before talking to buyers? Run the valuation tool. For how acquirers source in niche markets, see why vertical-specific buyers outperform generalists.

Other Government Contracting & Defense Services subindustries

Frequently asked questions

What multiple does a defense training or simulation company sell for?

It depends on whether you sell software and simulators or instructor labor. CAE paid about 13.5x estimated 2020 adjusted EBITDA for L3Harris Military Training, while Cubic's training services unit sold to Valiant at 7.6x. Both are pre-2022 deals; recent deals in the sector have not disclosed terms.

Is training and simulation M&A picking up?

Yes. Capstone Partners reports a 47.5% rise in sector deal volume in 2025 and 14 deals announced or completed in 2026 through early June, up 133.3%. Capstone's count includes civilian training as well as defense.

Who is buying training and simulation companies?

Mostly strategics, which did 72.9% of 2025 deals. Recent examples include Shield AI buying Aechelon Technology from Sagewind Capital and Sagewind-backed By Light buying Dignitas Technologies. Private equity re-engaged in 2026, with five of six PE deals being add-ons.

Which NAICS code applies to a defense training company?

Often not 611430. The 611430 size standard is $15.0 million, against $34.0 million for flight training (611512) and for computer systems design (541512). Simulator, engineering and software work is usually coded to those or to manufacturing and engineering codes, so check which codes your contracts actually carry.

What will a buyer look at first?

Program positions, backlog and recurring revenue. In the L3Harris deal, CAE highlighted backlog and positions on the USAF SCARS, F-16 simulator training and Navy/Marine Corps F/A-18 aircrew training programs. Buyers also separate proprietary software and devices from instructor labor.

Sources

  1. Training & Simulation Sector Update, June 2026 — Capstone Partners, 2026-06-02 (accessed 2026-10-03)
  2. CAE to acquire L3Harris Technologies' Military Training business for US$1.05 billion (Form 6-K, Exhibit 99.1) — CAE Inc. via SEC EDGAR, 2021-03-01 (accessed 2026-10-03)
  3. PAE Incorporated definitive merger proxy (DEFM14A), Selected Transactions Analysis — PAE Incorporated via SEC EDGAR, 2022-01-11 (accessed 2026-10-03)
  4. CAE fourth quarter and fiscal 2026 results (Form 6-K, Exhibit 99.1) — CAE Inc. via SEC EDGAR, 2026-05-21 (accessed 2026-10-03)
  5. Cubic Agrees to Sell its Training Services Business for Approximately $135 Million (Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1) — Cubic Corporation via SEC EDGAR, 2018-04-19 (accessed 2026-10-03)
  6. Veritas Capital and Evergreen Coast Capital to Acquire Cubic (Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1) — Cubic Corporation via SEC EDGAR, 2021-02-08 (accessed 2026-10-03)
  7. Cubic completes acquisition by Veritas Capital and Evergreen Coast Capital (Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1) — Cubic Corporation via SEC EDGAR, 2021-05-25 (accessed 2026-10-03)
  8. BAE Systems buys military simulations firm for $200 million — C4ISRNET, 2022-03-07 (accessed 2026-10-03)
  9. Arotech Corporation definitive merger proxy (DEFM14A), Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis — Arotech Corporation via SEC EDGAR, 2019-11-04 (accessed 2026-10-03)
  10. Arotech to be acquired by Greenbriar Equity Group (Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1) — Arotech Corporation via SEC EDGAR, 2019-09 (accessed 2026-10-03)
  11. 13 CFR § 121.201 — Small business size standards by NAICS industry — Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute (eCFR text), 2026 (accessed 2026-10-03)
  12. 13 CFR § 125.12 — Recertification of size and small business program status — Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute (eCFR text), 2026 (accessed 2026-10-03)
  13. 48 CFR § 42.1204 — Applicability of novation agreements — Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute (eCFR text), 2026 (accessed 2026-10-03)
  14. Fiscal Year 2027 Topline — The White House (Office of Management and Budget), 2026-04 (accessed 2026-10-03)

For buyers

Have a mandate in Defense Training & Simulation Services? Share your buy box.

Share your buy box

For owners

Own a business in Defense Training & Simulation Services? Book a confidential call.

Book a confidential call

For buyers

See who's in your buy box.

Book a consultation

For owners

Thinking about selling?

Tell us about your business
© 2026 Axia GrowthPrivacyDisclaimer